The Bottom Line
Pros
- Likable lead in Paul Iacono as RJ Berger
- A good feel for classic high school comedy in movies and on TV
- Potential to develop a wide ensemble of characters
Cons
- Excessive reliance on gross-out jokes
- Uses every high school cliché imaginable
- Supporting characters mostly one-dimensional
Description
- Premiere episode airs June 6, 2010, at 11 p.m. EST on MTV; subsequent episodes air Mondays at 10 p.m. EST starting June 14
- Starring Paul Iacono, Jareb Dauplaise, Amber Lancaster, Jayson Blair, Kara Taitz
- Created by David Katzenberg and Seth Grahame-Smith
Guide Review - 'The Hard Times of RJ Berger' Premiere Episodes
Creators David Katzenberg and Seth Grahame-Smith clearly have a great love for classic teen comedies, and thus Hard Times drags out the big guns of teen stories pretty quickly: In the second episode, lovable loser RJ runs for student-body president, and in the third he gets the lead in the school play. At this rate homecoming, the big game and the prom will probably all show up before the first season is halfway over. Those touchstones are probably meant to make the show feel iconic, but so far they come off more like predictable clichés.
The main characters, too, are right out of the Teen Comedy 101 playbook: There’s RJ, the nerd, whose only unexpected quality is the large manhood referenced in the show’s title. There’s RJ’s oversexed, overweight best friend Miles and his sarcastic platonic female pal Lily (who’s no Daria). There’s RJ’s bland blonde dream girl and her jerky jock boyfriend. All that’s missing to complete the Breakfast Club set is the druggie burnout.
The plot device of RJ’s big member is treated as extremely important in the first episode and then practically ignored later; likewise, there are several bleeped F-words in the pilot, and none in subsequent episodes. It’s like the creators got much of the vulgarity (but certainly not all of it) out of their system early on, and then settled into something more mainstream. The show still relies on too many high school clichés and is too willing to go “edgy” for a cheap laugh, but if it finds its footing, it could almost be worthy of all the teen-comedy comparisons it’s begging for.


